|
|
News
Topic has 202 replies.
 
 
|
|
Sort Posts:
|
|
|
|
28/04/2008, 11:09 AM
|
swampie
Joined on 10/05/2007
Norfolk
Posts 78
|
Re: Shoreline Management - a threat to the Broads?
|
|
|
|
|
So what happens, if the sea breaches say in the next couple of years, say for example we have a big storm.... will we all be chucked out of our homes or will the sea go back again after a few months as it did in 1938.
How does insurance work in that sitituation if insurance states that it rebuilds the property.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
28/04/2008, 11:12 AM
|
keith gerrard

Joined on 16/04/2004
Posts 11,317
|
Re: Shoreline Management - a threat to the Broads?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/04/2008, 11:34 AM
|
keith gerrard

Joined on 16/04/2004
Posts 11,317
|
Re: Shoreline Management - a threat to the Broads?
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the intention is to stop rebuilding and developing current sea defenses, then the sea will not go back swampie.
If it is a tidal surge, then it will retreat but leave a huge amount of salt water, mostly in stagnant pools and shallow lakes.
Salt marsh would slowly form, the extent of which is difficult to estimate.
This could happen tomorrow!!!
Although it is unlikely.
Of course the sea would then be open to easier access if no work was undertaken and it would continue to come in and go out until the area became a part of the North Sea.
Time scale estimate between 20 and 50 years.
Dream on keithgerrard@gerrard24.freeserve.co.uk
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
28/04/2008, 6:46 PM
|
nevermind
Joined on 28/05/2007
Posts 1,741
|
Re: Shoreline Management - a threat to the Broads?
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is always one joker in the pack who is trying to neatify greedy royals, well done Scaramouche, your in with some maundy money next year which should by you a few lines of your favourite 'snooty nose' sherbot.
Anything to confuse the general public, eh and what a bore it is to be repetitous. nevermind
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
28/04/2008, 6:52 PM
|
Jill

Joined on 15/08/2005
Norfolk
Posts 1,999
|
Re: Shoreline Management - a threat to the Broads?
|
|
|
|
|
You can say that again,nevermind
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
28/04/2008, 8:18 PM
|
keith gerrard

Joined on 16/04/2004
Posts 11,317
|
Re: Shoreline Management - a threat to the Broads?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28/04/2008, 9:01 PM
|
nevermind
Joined on 28/05/2007
Posts 1,741
|
Re: Shoreline Management - a threat to the Broads?
|
|
|
|
|
Lionheart wrote: | |
Yes and the seabed off the coast is owned by HMQ
No it isn't, don't be ridiculous. You apparently have no idea what a 'constitutional monarchy' is!
|
|
Don't start looking it up, sadly its true, nothing ridiculous about it. Within the 12 mile zone my brave friend of cold steel. nevermind
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
29/04/2008, 12:48 PM
|
swampie
Joined on 10/05/2007
Norfolk
Posts 78
|
Re: Shoreline Management - a threat to the Broads?
|
|
|
|
|
keith gerrard wrote: | If the intention is to stop rebuilding and developing current sea defenses, then the sea will not go back swampie.
If it is a tidal surge, then it will retreat but leave a huge amount of salt water, mostly in stagnant pools and shallow lakes.
Salt marsh would slowly form, the extent of which is difficult to estimate.
This could happen tomorrow!!!
Although it is unlikely.
Of course the sea would then be open to easier access if no work was undertaken and it would continue to come in and go out until the area became a part of the North Sea.
Time scale estimate between 20 and 50 years. |
|
If that is the case, the land will be salt marsh, a combination of land and sea, not sea bed. How can the queen own that... And my house and garden will still be there.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
29/04/2008, 2:11 PM
|
Scaramouche

Joined on 02/04/2006
obscure
Posts 1,396
|
Re: Shoreline Management - a threat to the Broads?
|
|
|
|
|
nevermind wrote: | There is always one joker in the pack who is trying to neatify greedy royals, well done Scaramouche, your in with some maundy money next year which should by you a few lines of your favourite 'snooty nose' sherbot.
Anything to confuse the general public, eh and what a bore it is to be repetitous. nevermind
|
|
Through the aid of a skilled intepreter, I've come to the conclusion that that your post above accuses me of being a substance abuser. This is
DEFAMATION!
I should of course be contacting that noble old jurist EQUITATOR and via a massive fee, retaining him to pursue you for your last penny and beyond.
I should - but there again - this means that I would be forced to actually meet the awful, fustian old pedant and listen to his Rumpole - style reminiscences. So frankly, I can't be arsed.
Also knowing my luck, I'd probably have to settle for a huge legal bill and free window-cleaning on account.
I'll have you know the only lines I take are a few rhyming couplets. So I'll have a little Germanic apology instead, won't I?
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
29/04/2008, 6:43 PM
|
Scaramouche

Joined on 02/04/2006
obscure
Posts 1,396
|
Re: Shoreline Management - a threat to the Broads?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30/04/2008, 8:24 AM
|
nevermind
Joined on 28/05/2007
Posts 1,741
|
Re: Shoreline Management - a threat to the Broads?
|
|
|
|
|
Scaramouche wrote: | |
here is your reply, dearest jester.
Rupert, your coastal journey is taking you into a strange murky weed-infested world, and we ain't talking samphire. Prepare to be confused. Old British hippies are bad enough at losing things in translation.. Old Euro-Green hippies are worse.
Just ask yourself the question - how long is my day?
not much more to be said about sherbot, Scare me to death mouche. nevermind
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
30/04/2008, 8:24 AM
|
nevermind
Joined on 28/05/2007
Posts 1,741
|
Re: Shoreline Management - a threat to the Broads?
|
|
|
|
|
Scaramouche wrote: | |
here is your reply, dearest jester.
Rupert, your coastal journey is taking you into a strange murky weed-infested world, and we ain't talking samphire. Prepare to be confused. Old British hippies are bad enough at losing things in translation.. Old Euro-Green hippies are worse.
Just ask yourself the question - how long is my day?
not much more to be said about sherbot, Scare me to death mouche. nevermind
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
30/04/2008, 10:09 AM
|
Scaramouche

Joined on 02/04/2006
obscure
Posts 1,396
|
Re: Shoreline Management - a threat to the Broads?
|
|
|
|
|
Oh Puer, puer, (as Sid James once said), Nevermind.
Your public position on the LCA more than justifies my gentle dig about weed, whilst your blundering response which purports to categorise me as a Class A drug abuser, is neither proportional nor funny.
And of course I'm not threatening you.
I may mock the afflicted, but I don't waste time or breath making them the subject of vendettas.
I suppose what I'm actually saying old sport, is that in this post moderation era, and on this forum, it might benefit you to actually read what you've written for once, rather than consign it thoughtlessly to the rest of us.
And if you want me to take a joke, please make it a better one.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
|
EDP24 Forums » EDP24 General » News » Re: Shoreline Management - a threat to the Broads?
|
|
|
|