I do not recall the actual silly 'new labour' jibe christopher, I make so many.
However I shall be watching the Turkish GP tomorrow, does that help?
Dream on
keithgerrard@gerrard24.freeserve.co.uk
ChristopherE wrote:Many years ago,perhaps around the events of 9/11 there was debate on this forum about the origins and history of the conflict twixt east and west..At some time before I had bought a history book at Litcham school summer 'fayre.' The author suggested that the 'Age of Reason' was a direct follow on from the Ottoman failure in battle.
Sounds a little flakey to me. Which book is this? Which Ottoman failure? Vienna?
Of course the Pope has his own thoughts about the role of reason in this general context. Would this be related?
ChristopherE wrote:Indeed it was Vienna, maybe an "OUPS" volume, possibly a Trevellyan author, 20 years ago now. The book was certainly first published in the late 1800s So the author was possibly at some stage a student of someone who grew up in in the late 1700s . Flakey history? Closer to the cataclysmic events of those times than you or I. And we are rewriting the 70s now.It was part of a paragraph that was describing the reasons of the great explorationsof the late 1600s.. Not some spice trail adventure. More a desperate need to find new lands for the ruling houses of Europe . Defeat at Vienna meant a respite of some 500 years.Age of Reason for Europe ensued. (Nitpicking, but the vanquished had already had their own age of reason for many centuries)I really should be in Paris on such a lovely day.Christopher
If I understand this correctly, your book is attributing the Siege of Vienna to "a desperate need to find new lands for the ruling houses of Europe". That's beyond flakey. Way way beyond.
Perhaps it is because they are obscure ?
Yosemite is overdue !
Copyright © 2007 Archant Regional Limited. All rights reserved. Terms and conditions